The event horizon is a geometrical construct that is a perfect (well, for non rotating black holes with little or no net charge) sphere PROSCRIBED ON A NON EUCLIDIAN SURFACE. "It must be a total mess of “immiscible” event horizons."ĭon't extend analogies beyond their applicability. In the same way as "Does a triangle with three straight sides get distorted into some strange shape if you draw it on a sphere". "Does this mean the event horizon of the blackholes gets squashed out of spherical into some increasingly strange shape?" No, every human, ear enough, has eyes and the Mk1 Eyeball has been able to discern diagrams ever since the first scribing tool was invented. "I sent schematic diagram of photon to White house and prime ministers office, but mankind dose not have technology to observe it." You need a scheme yourself before you can make a comparison. "That is why I have been able to give information and later confirmed by space crafts past 40 year" "my information will not fit into current picture."Īh, the lorn-filled cry of the lesser spotted crank looking for a mate. Yes, you certainly LOVE leaping to the conclusion, don't you? Hell, the IEEE floating point values of the supercomputers which use 128-bit floats doesn't preserve that level of accuracy in the mantissa. It's not even a rounding error on the biggest desk calculator. "īecause the coulomb repulsion between two electrons is 36 orders of magnitude bigger than their gravitational attraction. "I read articles but nowhere I have seen gravity structure or it’s interaction with nuclei. In 1980s I sent schematic diagram of photon to White house and prime ministers office, but mankind dose not have technology to observe it. If you know any where I can find structure of gravity, photon, electron and nuclei please let me know. They cal it discovery I call it re-inventing the wheels. That is why I have been able to give information and later confirmed by space crafts past 40 years. my information will not fit into current picture. if they knew gravity interaction with nuclei they would rewrite their science books. like invited audience of game show every one give standing aviation, but I can not because I know they are wrong. then like a child satisfying smile after having forced the square shape into the round hole. Now with the new technology they gather information and make it fit to the picture. With this picture they explain the universe. From them they have made a plausible picture and explanation. I have seen endless coverage of observed effect of gravity. I read articles but nowhere I have seen gravity structure or it's interaction with nuclei. The EHT, by resolving the disk, can help to either reject or confirm those models. There are models where Sgr A* could be just a really dense physical object, in which case it would have a true _surface_ which could absorb, emit, and reflect radiation. Whether we observe any radiation from the disk of the hole, will allow us to set limits on alternative models or formulations of gravity. If we were reasonably close to it (a few hundred light years, for example), then it would look very much like a circular hole in the sky (check out "Bok globules" ( ) for a visual analogue), surrounding by a hot, glowing accretion disk. If the object at Sgr A* is really a black hole, then the event horizon neither reflects nor emits any radiation at all, at any observable wavelength. The third figure on this page shows the expected results for two different models. #2: What we _should_ actually see (keep in mind that this is at radio and microwavelengths, NOT visible light!) is a truly black (i.e., zero emission) region, surrounded by a bright, distorted ring corresponding to the accretion disk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |